Medical Staff Credentialing & Peer Review in Arizona
Medical Staff Credentialing
Hospitals and many health care entities are required by law to evaluate the competency of physicians providing services to patients at their institution. Credentialing is the process by which hospitals and health care entities verify and evaluate the qualifications of physicians to ensure they possess the necessary qualifications. Physicians can apply for both medical staff membership and clinical privileges at hospitals and certain health care entities. A clinical privilege is a right granted by a hospital or a health care entity to a physician that allows the physician to perform certain procedures or operations, or to admit patients at the institution. Hospitals and health care entities verify physician qualifications for medical staff membership and clinical privileges through the credentialing process, which includes the collection, verification and evaluation of information and data relevant to the physician’s education, training and professional experience.
Physicians may be denied membership or privileges because of something in their background (e.g. prior disciplinary action, professional license discipline, criminal history, issues with education/training, and medical malpractice judgments or settlements). In addition, physicians may be denied privileges when they fail to accurately answer questions on a credentialing application or fail to disclose issues in their background. Sometimes, the credentialing process is used to deny a physician membership or privileges at a hospital or health care entity for improper purposes. The denial of medical staff membership or privileges may be reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). Consequently, it is important that you immediately contact a health care attorney for assistance when you learn of problems with your credentialing or privileging application at an Arizona hospital or health care entity.
The attorneys at Goldberg Law Group regularly advise and represent physicians and other practitioners who have been denied medical staff membership and/or clinical privileges. If there is something in your background which you think needs to be disclosed and/or may result in your credentialing application being denied, you should seek immediate legal advice from an experienced health care attorney. Our team of attorneys will evaluate the information and help you explain the issue in the best light.
Medical Staff Peer Review
In general, the peer review process is instituted when a physician’s performance or behavior is called into question. Peer review can result in disciplinary action (i.e. the suspension, restriction, termination, revocation or non-renewal of medical staff membership and clinical privileges). Disciplinary action, in turn, results in a cascade of legal consequences that can be devastating to a physician’s medical practice and reputation.
A physician facing the prospect of peer review should seek help from an experienced health care attorney, who is familiar with medical staff peer review, as soon as the process begins. An understanding of the peer review process, and its consequences, is important for any physician faced with the prospect of peer review. The sooner you seek legal advice, the better you will be able to protect yourself from potentially devastating consequences.
Medical staff peer review is subject to certain requirements and protections set forth in Federal and Arizona State laws. These requirements and protections should also be reflected in the medical staff bylaws and credentialing policies adopted by the hospital or health care entity. Sometimes the bylaws or policies do not match the requirements of Arizona State and/or Federal laws. Sometimes the institution will not follow their bylaws altogether. It is essential that any physician affected by peer review hire an experienced health care attorney to ensure that they are being afforded due process.
The consequences of peer review go far beyond whether a physician will retain his ability to work at a particular hospital or health care entity. Many peer review actions result in a report to the NPDB, a national clearinghouse of information regarding physician misconduct. An NPDB report stating that a physician was subject to discipline by peers will be reported to the Arizona Medical Board and can be the basis for an investigation and disciplinary action by the Board. The NPDB report will also be available to other hospitals and health care entities, federal agencies, state agencies administering health care programs, health plans, private accreditation organizations, peer review organizations and private accreditation organizations.
Sometimes problematic clinical or behavioral performance by a physician will be addressed informally by a hospital or health care entity through administration or a departmental chair. A physician may be approached with an alleged competence or conduct issue and offered a warning or counseling, or will be asked to complete a performance improvement plan or some type of voluntary remediation. When considering whether to accept such informal action, the biggest concern is whether the action is reportable to the NPDB. An experienced health care attorney’s counsel can be invaluable in helping to guide the process to the client’s advantage. When informal disposition is not available, the matter will often proceed to the formal investigation and fair hearing stage.
An investigation may be initiated by another physician, a medical staff department, or the medical staff’s Medical Executive Committee (“MEC”) after a poor patient outcome, a report of disruptive behavior, or a complaint of physician impairment. Sometimes the reason for the investigation is motivated by something other than medical care or behavior.
Depending on the severity of the allegations, the hospital or health care entity may decide to summarily suspend the physician’s privileges during the investigation. However, this should only occur in situations in which there is evidence of an immediate danger to patients or the public. A suspension of privileges that stays in effect for more than thirty days is reportable to the NPDB. Therefore, under Federal law, a hearing must be provided any time a suspension has been in effect for more than 14 days.
At the beginning of any investigation, the hospital or health care entity should notify the physician in writing of the allegations. During the investigation, the physician’s ability to actively defend against the allegations is limited, but he or she should be offered an opportunity to respond to the allegations, verbally and/or in writing.
When the investigation is concluded, the MEC, or similar committee responsible for governing the medical staff, will make a recommendation. The MEC may recommend that the physician’s clinical privileges be suspended, restricted, terminated, or revoked. If so, the MEC must timely notify the physician in writing of the reasons for its recommendation and inform the physician of his or her right to request a hearing.
If the physician decides to resign his or her privileges during investigation, it will result in a NPDB report.
While peer review is designed to promote and improve quality of care for patients, it can be contentious, and is sometimes used for an improper purpose. The results of a peer review can severely and adversely affect a physician’s ability to practice medicine. It is important for a physician involved in the peer review process to retain experienced legal counsel with knowledge of Arizona State and Federal laws pertaining to medical staff peer review. The attorneys at Goldberg Law Group routinely assist physicians in their interactions with hospital and health care entities during peer review to ensure that the review is conducted in compliance with Arizona State and Federal laws and the medical staff bylaws.
16427 N. Scottsdale Road -
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
120 South Riverside Plaza –
Chicago, IL 60606
Practice Areas in Arizona
Our attorneys are vigorous advocates for physicians in medical staff hearings and appeals. We work hard to protect and preserve the rights of Illinois and Arizona physicians under the medical staff bylaws and state and federal laws and defend adverse actions that threaten your membership and privileges.
Medicare & Medicaid Audits
In the current regulatory environment, healthcare providers face increasing scrutiny from government healthcare programs. Goldberg Law Group provides strategic legal representation in all types of Medicare and Medicaid audits and claim reviews.
Third Party Payer Audits
Third party payer audits present a significant financial risk for physicians, industry service providers, and medical groups. Our attorneys have years of experience representing physicians and other providers in in audits and claim reviews initiated by commercial payers.
Healthcare Merger & Acquisition Transactions
Goldberg Law Group’s attorneys guide clients through the complex legal and regulatory issues in merger, acquisition, sales, and affiliation transactions involving physician groups, medical practices, and healthcare industry service providers.
Medical Staff Credentialing & Peer Review
Our healthcare attorneys routinely counsel and advise physicians with issues related to medical staff credentialing and peer review. We identify and safeguard your rights under the medical staff bylaws and applicable laws and make sure your status is presented in the most favorable light.
Corporate Formation & Organization
Healthcare providers who are interested in forming and organizing their own business must adhere to a unique set of laws and regulations. Our attorneys rely upon industry-specific knowledge gained through 40 years of experience to advise physicians, chiropractors and other healthcare service providers through the process of forming and organizing their own business.
Corporate Disputes, Licensing & Litigation
The lawyers at Goldberg Law Group provide legal advice and representation in business-to-business disputes and in conflicts that arise amongst individual stakeholders.